Review




Structured Review

ABclonal Biotechnology rabbit anti-serping1 antibody
Rabbit Anti Serping1 Antibody, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti-serping1 antibody/product/ABclonal Biotechnology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti-serping1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

93
Sino Biological rp02
Rp02, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rp02/product/Sino Biological
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rp02 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
Novus Biologicals polyclonal rabbit anti human serping1 antibody
Polyclonal Rabbit Anti Human Serping1 Antibody, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/polyclonal rabbit anti human serping1 antibody/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polyclonal rabbit anti human serping1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ABclonal Biotechnology rabbit anti-serping1 antibody
Rabbit Anti Serping1 Antibody, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti-serping1 antibody/product/ABclonal Biotechnology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti-serping1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech rabbit anti serping1 antibody
Fig. 3 β-arrestin1 in astrocytes modulates cognitive impairments and astrocytic reactivity in the mouse model for POD. A β-arrestin1 protein levels in brain lysate of WT and β-arrestin1−/− mice. B Experimental protocol and timeline of the POD mouse model. C Representative moving track plots (red curve) of mice in the second trial of Y-maze test. Blue box represents the novel arm. D Time (%) spent in the novel arm in the Y-maze test. E Bouts of novel arm entry in the Y-maze test. F Representative moving track plots (red curve) of mice in the probe trial of Morris water maze test. Black circle represents the invisible platform. G Latency (s) to reach the hidden platform in the probe test of Morris water maze test. H Crossing times in target quadrant in the probe test of Morris water maze test. I Representative immunofluorescent staining of GFAP in the hippocampus. J Analysis of GFAP-positive cell body area in the hippocampus. K Analysis of GFAP-positive cell numbers in the hippocampus. L Heatmap of the expression level of the neurotoxic astrocytes-specific transcripts in the hippocampus. M Expression of C3, <t>Serping1</t> and Psmb8 in the hippocampus. N Densitometric analysis of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8. O Schematic diagram of the mice model with micro-injection of AAV-siβ-arrestin1 into the hippocampus. P Immunofluorescent co-localization of GFP and GFAP (red) after the AAV micro-injection. Q Representative immunofluorescent staining of GFAP (red) in the hippocampus. R Analysis of astrocytic reactivity by GFAP-positive cell body area and GFAP-positive cell numbers in the hippocampus. S Bouts of novel arm entry in the Y-maze test. T Time (%) spent in the novel arm in the Y-maze test. U Latency (s) to reach the hidden platform in the probe test of Morris water maze test. V Crossing times in target quadrant in the probe test of Morris water maze test. For C-M except for R, data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. the WT-CON group or NC AAV CON group. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 vs. the WT-POD mice or NC AAV POD. For R, data are analyzed by unpaired Student’s t-test. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 vs. the NC AAV POD group. n = 6 mice per group for immunofluorescent staining. n = 3 for western blotting. n = 7–10 mice for behavioral tests. Values are presented as means ± SEM
Rabbit Anti Serping1 Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti serping1 antibody/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti serping1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GeneTex rabbit polyclonal anti-serping1 antibody
Details of the primers used for quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis
Rabbit Polyclonal Anti Serping1 Antibody, supplied by GeneTex, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal anti-serping1 antibody/product/GeneTex
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit polyclonal anti-serping1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech rabbit antibodies against serpin family g member 1
Details of the primers used for quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis
Rabbit Antibodies Against Serpin Family G Member 1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit antibodies against serpin family g member 1/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit antibodies against serpin family g member 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech rabbit anti serping1
Details of the primers used for quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis
Rabbit Anti Serping1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti serping1/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti serping1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Fig. 3 β-arrestin1 in astrocytes modulates cognitive impairments and astrocytic reactivity in the mouse model for POD. A β-arrestin1 protein levels in brain lysate of WT and β-arrestin1−/− mice. B Experimental protocol and timeline of the POD mouse model. C Representative moving track plots (red curve) of mice in the second trial of Y-maze test. Blue box represents the novel arm. D Time (%) spent in the novel arm in the Y-maze test. E Bouts of novel arm entry in the Y-maze test. F Representative moving track plots (red curve) of mice in the probe trial of Morris water maze test. Black circle represents the invisible platform. G Latency (s) to reach the hidden platform in the probe test of Morris water maze test. H Crossing times in target quadrant in the probe test of Morris water maze test. I Representative immunofluorescent staining of GFAP in the hippocampus. J Analysis of GFAP-positive cell body area in the hippocampus. K Analysis of GFAP-positive cell numbers in the hippocampus. L Heatmap of the expression level of the neurotoxic astrocytes-specific transcripts in the hippocampus. M Expression of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8 in the hippocampus. N Densitometric analysis of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8. O Schematic diagram of the mice model with micro-injection of AAV-siβ-arrestin1 into the hippocampus. P Immunofluorescent co-localization of GFP and GFAP (red) after the AAV micro-injection. Q Representative immunofluorescent staining of GFAP (red) in the hippocampus. R Analysis of astrocytic reactivity by GFAP-positive cell body area and GFAP-positive cell numbers in the hippocampus. S Bouts of novel arm entry in the Y-maze test. T Time (%) spent in the novel arm in the Y-maze test. U Latency (s) to reach the hidden platform in the probe test of Morris water maze test. V Crossing times in target quadrant in the probe test of Morris water maze test. For C-M except for R, data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. the WT-CON group or NC AAV CON group. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 vs. the WT-POD mice or NC AAV POD. For R, data are analyzed by unpaired Student’s t-test. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 vs. the NC AAV POD group. n = 6 mice per group for immunofluorescent staining. n = 3 for western blotting. n = 7–10 mice for behavioral tests. Values are presented as means ± SEM

Journal: Journal of neuroinflammation

Article Title: β-arrestin1 regulates astrocytic reactivity via Drp1-dependent mitochondrial fission: implications in postoperative delirium.

doi: 10.1186/s12974-023-02794-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 3 β-arrestin1 in astrocytes modulates cognitive impairments and astrocytic reactivity in the mouse model for POD. A β-arrestin1 protein levels in brain lysate of WT and β-arrestin1−/− mice. B Experimental protocol and timeline of the POD mouse model. C Representative moving track plots (red curve) of mice in the second trial of Y-maze test. Blue box represents the novel arm. D Time (%) spent in the novel arm in the Y-maze test. E Bouts of novel arm entry in the Y-maze test. F Representative moving track plots (red curve) of mice in the probe trial of Morris water maze test. Black circle represents the invisible platform. G Latency (s) to reach the hidden platform in the probe test of Morris water maze test. H Crossing times in target quadrant in the probe test of Morris water maze test. I Representative immunofluorescent staining of GFAP in the hippocampus. J Analysis of GFAP-positive cell body area in the hippocampus. K Analysis of GFAP-positive cell numbers in the hippocampus. L Heatmap of the expression level of the neurotoxic astrocytes-specific transcripts in the hippocampus. M Expression of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8 in the hippocampus. N Densitometric analysis of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8. O Schematic diagram of the mice model with micro-injection of AAV-siβ-arrestin1 into the hippocampus. P Immunofluorescent co-localization of GFP and GFAP (red) after the AAV micro-injection. Q Representative immunofluorescent staining of GFAP (red) in the hippocampus. R Analysis of astrocytic reactivity by GFAP-positive cell body area and GFAP-positive cell numbers in the hippocampus. S Bouts of novel arm entry in the Y-maze test. T Time (%) spent in the novel arm in the Y-maze test. U Latency (s) to reach the hidden platform in the probe test of Morris water maze test. V Crossing times in target quadrant in the probe test of Morris water maze test. For C-M except for R, data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. the WT-CON group or NC AAV CON group. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 vs. the WT-POD mice or NC AAV POD. For R, data are analyzed by unpaired Student’s t-test. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 vs. the NC AAV POD group. n = 6 mice per group for immunofluorescent staining. n = 3 for western blotting. n = 7–10 mice for behavioral tests. Values are presented as means ± SEM

Article Snippet: After blocking with 10% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline (20 mM Tris– HCl, 500 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) with Tween 20 (Aladdin, #T104863), the membranes were then probed with the following primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C: mouse anti-GFAP antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, #3670), rabbit anti-Iba-1 antibody (1:1000, Wako, #019-19741), rabbit anti-β-arrestin1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technologies, #12697), rabbit anti-βarrestin2 (1:200, Cell Signaling Technologies, #3857), rabbit anti-C3 antibody (1:1000, abcam, #ab11887), rabbit anti-Serping1 antibody (1:1000, proteintech, #12259-1-AP), rabbit anti-Psmb8 antibody (1:1000, proteintech, #14859-1-AP), mouse anti-Fis1 antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, #sc-376447), mouse anti-Drp1 antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, #sc-101270), rabbit anti-Drp1 antibody (1:1000, proteintech, #12957-1- AP), rabbit anti-COX IV antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, #4850), mouse anti-β-actin antibody (1:3000, sigma, #a1978).

Techniques: Staining, Expressing, Microinjection, Western Blot

Fig. 4 β-arrestin1 deletion aggravates the neurotoxic reactivity of primary astrocytes. A Schematic of the experimental design. B Expression of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8 in the primary astrocytes. C Densitometric analysis of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8. D Heat map of A1 astrocytic genes in primary cell cultures. E Immunofluorescent staining of C3 (green) and GFAP (red) in primary astrocytes. F Immunofluorescent staining of Serping1 (red) and GFAP (green) in primary astrocytes. G Relative co-localized signals of the GFAP-positive and C3-positive immunofluorescent particles between groups. H Relative co-localized signals of the GFAP-positive and Serping1-positive immunofluorescent particles between groups. I Astrocytes were stained with MitoSOX and analyzed by flow cytometry. J JC-1 staining in astrocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry. K Quantification of the mitochondrial ROS in MitoSOX staining. L Quantification of the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential in JC-1 staining measured by flow cytometry. M Oxygen consumption rates were evaluated by Seahorse. N Quantification of oxygen consumption for ATP production, basal respiration and proton leak. O ATP levels in astrocytes. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. the WT CON-MCM group. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 vs. the WT LPS-MCM group. Values are presented as means ± SEM from at least three independent experiments

Journal: Journal of neuroinflammation

Article Title: β-arrestin1 regulates astrocytic reactivity via Drp1-dependent mitochondrial fission: implications in postoperative delirium.

doi: 10.1186/s12974-023-02794-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 4 β-arrestin1 deletion aggravates the neurotoxic reactivity of primary astrocytes. A Schematic of the experimental design. B Expression of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8 in the primary astrocytes. C Densitometric analysis of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8. D Heat map of A1 astrocytic genes in primary cell cultures. E Immunofluorescent staining of C3 (green) and GFAP (red) in primary astrocytes. F Immunofluorescent staining of Serping1 (red) and GFAP (green) in primary astrocytes. G Relative co-localized signals of the GFAP-positive and C3-positive immunofluorescent particles between groups. H Relative co-localized signals of the GFAP-positive and Serping1-positive immunofluorescent particles between groups. I Astrocytes were stained with MitoSOX and analyzed by flow cytometry. J JC-1 staining in astrocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry. K Quantification of the mitochondrial ROS in MitoSOX staining. L Quantification of the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential in JC-1 staining measured by flow cytometry. M Oxygen consumption rates were evaluated by Seahorse. N Quantification of oxygen consumption for ATP production, basal respiration and proton leak. O ATP levels in astrocytes. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. the WT CON-MCM group. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 vs. the WT LPS-MCM group. Values are presented as means ± SEM from at least three independent experiments

Article Snippet: After blocking with 10% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline (20 mM Tris– HCl, 500 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) with Tween 20 (Aladdin, #T104863), the membranes were then probed with the following primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C: mouse anti-GFAP antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, #3670), rabbit anti-Iba-1 antibody (1:1000, Wako, #019-19741), rabbit anti-β-arrestin1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technologies, #12697), rabbit anti-βarrestin2 (1:200, Cell Signaling Technologies, #3857), rabbit anti-C3 antibody (1:1000, abcam, #ab11887), rabbit anti-Serping1 antibody (1:1000, proteintech, #12259-1-AP), rabbit anti-Psmb8 antibody (1:1000, proteintech, #14859-1-AP), mouse anti-Fis1 antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, #sc-376447), mouse anti-Drp1 antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, #sc-101270), rabbit anti-Drp1 antibody (1:1000, proteintech, #12957-1- AP), rabbit anti-COX IV antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, #4850), mouse anti-β-actin antibody (1:3000, sigma, #a1978).

Techniques: Expressing, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Membrane

Fig. 8 β-arrestin1-biased ligand Carvedilol protects POD mice from pro-inflammatory phenotypes. A Experimental protocol and timeline of the mouse model. B Representative immunofluorescent staining of GFAP in the hippocampus. C Relative GFAP-positive cell body area in the hippocampus. D Relative GFAP-positive cell numbers in the hippocampus. E Heatmap of the expression level of the A1-specific transcripts in hippocampal samples. F Expression of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8 in the hippocampus. G Densitometric analysis of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8. H Representative moving track plots (red curve) of mice in the second trial of Y-maze test. Blue box represents the novel arm. I Time (%) spent in the novel arm in the Y-maze test. J Bouts of novel arm entry in the Y-maze test. K Representative moving track plots (red curve) of mice in the probe trial of Morris water maze test. Black circle represents the invisible platform. L Latency (s) to reach the hidden platform in the probe test of Morris water maze test. M Crossing times in target quadrant in the probe test of Morris water maze test. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s post-hoc test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. the CON group. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.01 vs. the POD group. n = 6 mice per group for immunofluorescent staining. n = 3 for western blotting. n = 10 mice for behavioral tests. Values are presented as means ± SEM

Journal: Journal of neuroinflammation

Article Title: β-arrestin1 regulates astrocytic reactivity via Drp1-dependent mitochondrial fission: implications in postoperative delirium.

doi: 10.1186/s12974-023-02794-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 8 β-arrestin1-biased ligand Carvedilol protects POD mice from pro-inflammatory phenotypes. A Experimental protocol and timeline of the mouse model. B Representative immunofluorescent staining of GFAP in the hippocampus. C Relative GFAP-positive cell body area in the hippocampus. D Relative GFAP-positive cell numbers in the hippocampus. E Heatmap of the expression level of the A1-specific transcripts in hippocampal samples. F Expression of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8 in the hippocampus. G Densitometric analysis of C3, Serping1 and Psmb8. H Representative moving track plots (red curve) of mice in the second trial of Y-maze test. Blue box represents the novel arm. I Time (%) spent in the novel arm in the Y-maze test. J Bouts of novel arm entry in the Y-maze test. K Representative moving track plots (red curve) of mice in the probe trial of Morris water maze test. Black circle represents the invisible platform. L Latency (s) to reach the hidden platform in the probe test of Morris water maze test. M Crossing times in target quadrant in the probe test of Morris water maze test. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s post-hoc test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. the CON group. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.01 vs. the POD group. n = 6 mice per group for immunofluorescent staining. n = 3 for western blotting. n = 10 mice for behavioral tests. Values are presented as means ± SEM

Article Snippet: After blocking with 10% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline (20 mM Tris– HCl, 500 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) with Tween 20 (Aladdin, #T104863), the membranes were then probed with the following primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C: mouse anti-GFAP antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, #3670), rabbit anti-Iba-1 antibody (1:1000, Wako, #019-19741), rabbit anti-β-arrestin1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technologies, #12697), rabbit anti-βarrestin2 (1:200, Cell Signaling Technologies, #3857), rabbit anti-C3 antibody (1:1000, abcam, #ab11887), rabbit anti-Serping1 antibody (1:1000, proteintech, #12259-1-AP), rabbit anti-Psmb8 antibody (1:1000, proteintech, #14859-1-AP), mouse anti-Fis1 antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, #sc-376447), mouse anti-Drp1 antibody (1:1000, Santa Cruz, #sc-101270), rabbit anti-Drp1 antibody (1:1000, proteintech, #12957-1- AP), rabbit anti-COX IV antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, #4850), mouse anti-β-actin antibody (1:3000, sigma, #a1978).

Techniques: Staining, Expressing, Western Blot

Details of the primers used for quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis

Journal: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology : RB&E

Article Title: Differential gene expression of serine protease inhibitors in bovine ovarian follicle: possible involvement in follicular growth and atresia

doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-72

Figure Lengend Snippet: Details of the primers used for quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis

Article Snippet: The 7-μm-thick follicular sections were incubated at room temperature for 4 h with rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPINA5 antibody (H00005104, Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan) diluted 1:10, rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPINB6 antibody (GTX114637, GeneTex Inc, Irvine, CA, USA) diluted 1:100, rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPINF2 antibody (H00005345, Abnova) diluted 1:20 or rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPING1 antibody (GTX105316, GeneTex) diluted 1:300 in Discovery Ab diluents (Roche).

Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR

QPCR analysis of SERPINA5, SERPINB6, SERPINE1, SERPINE2, SERPINF2 and SERPING1 in healthy and atretic follicles . Total RNA from the follicular wall (i.e., granulosa plus theca interna) was extracted from three healthy follicles and three atretic follicles. The expression of mRNA was normalized to the expression of GAPDH measured in the same RNA preparation. The black and white bars indicate healthy and atretic follicles, respectively. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. Different superscript letters denote significant differences ( P < 0.05).

Journal: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology : RB&E

Article Title: Differential gene expression of serine protease inhibitors in bovine ovarian follicle: possible involvement in follicular growth and atresia

doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-72

Figure Lengend Snippet: QPCR analysis of SERPINA5, SERPINB6, SERPINE1, SERPINE2, SERPINF2 and SERPING1 in healthy and atretic follicles . Total RNA from the follicular wall (i.e., granulosa plus theca interna) was extracted from three healthy follicles and three atretic follicles. The expression of mRNA was normalized to the expression of GAPDH measured in the same RNA preparation. The black and white bars indicate healthy and atretic follicles, respectively. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. Different superscript letters denote significant differences ( P < 0.05).

Article Snippet: The 7-μm-thick follicular sections were incubated at room temperature for 4 h with rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPINA5 antibody (H00005104, Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan) diluted 1:10, rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPINB6 antibody (GTX114637, GeneTex Inc, Irvine, CA, USA) diluted 1:100, rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPINF2 antibody (H00005345, Abnova) diluted 1:20 or rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPING1 antibody (GTX105316, GeneTex) diluted 1:300 in Discovery Ab diluents (Roche).

Techniques: Expressing

mRNA localization of SERPINA5, SERPINB6, SERPINF2 and SERPING1 in E 2 -active and E 2 -inactive follicles . SERPINA5, SERPINB6 and SERPINF2 mRNA was expressed more in healthy than in atretic follicles, while SERPING1 mRNA was expressed more in atretic than in healthy follicles in QPCR analysis. (A, C, E, G, I, K, M and O) Digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled anti-sense cRNA probes were used. (B, D, F, H, J, L, N and P) DIG-labeled sense cRNA probes were used. Sections (7 μm) of bovine follicles were hybridized with each probe. SERPINA5 (A, B, C and D), SERPINB6 (E, F, G and H) and SERPINF2 (I, J, K and L) mRNA were found in the GCs of E 2 -active follicles and a weak hybridization signal was detected in GCs of E 2 -inactive follicles. SERPING1 mRNA (M, N, O and P) was detected in both GCs and the TL of E 2 -inactive follicles and a weak hybridization signal was also detected in both GCs and the TL of E 2 -active follicles. Scale bars = 20 μm.

Journal: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology : RB&E

Article Title: Differential gene expression of serine protease inhibitors in bovine ovarian follicle: possible involvement in follicular growth and atresia

doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-72

Figure Lengend Snippet: mRNA localization of SERPINA5, SERPINB6, SERPINF2 and SERPING1 in E 2 -active and E 2 -inactive follicles . SERPINA5, SERPINB6 and SERPINF2 mRNA was expressed more in healthy than in atretic follicles, while SERPING1 mRNA was expressed more in atretic than in healthy follicles in QPCR analysis. (A, C, E, G, I, K, M and O) Digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled anti-sense cRNA probes were used. (B, D, F, H, J, L, N and P) DIG-labeled sense cRNA probes were used. Sections (7 μm) of bovine follicles were hybridized with each probe. SERPINA5 (A, B, C and D), SERPINB6 (E, F, G and H) and SERPINF2 (I, J, K and L) mRNA were found in the GCs of E 2 -active follicles and a weak hybridization signal was detected in GCs of E 2 -inactive follicles. SERPING1 mRNA (M, N, O and P) was detected in both GCs and the TL of E 2 -inactive follicles and a weak hybridization signal was also detected in both GCs and the TL of E 2 -active follicles. Scale bars = 20 μm.

Article Snippet: The 7-μm-thick follicular sections were incubated at room temperature for 4 h with rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPINA5 antibody (H00005104, Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan) diluted 1:10, rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPINB6 antibody (GTX114637, GeneTex Inc, Irvine, CA, USA) diluted 1:100, rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPINF2 antibody (H00005345, Abnova) diluted 1:20 or rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPING1 antibody (GTX105316, GeneTex) diluted 1:300 in Discovery Ab diluents (Roche).

Techniques: Labeling, Hybridization

Protein localization of SERPINA5, SERPINB6, SERPINF2 and SERPING1 in E 2 -active and E 2 -inactive follicles . Localization of SERPINA5 (A and B), SERPINB6 (C and D), SERPINF2 (E and F) and SERPING1 (G and H) protein was detected by immunohistochemistry. Sections (7 μm) of bovine E 2 -active (A, C, E and G) and E 2 -inactive follicles (B, D, F and H) were incubated with anti-SERPINA5, anti-SERPINB6, anti-SERPINF2 and anti-SERPING1 polyclonal antibodies. SERPINA5, SERPINB6 and SERPINF2 were detected in the GCs of E 2 -active and E 2 -inactive follicles. SERPING1 was detected in both GCs and the TL of E 2 -active and E 2 -inactive follicles. Negative control (I and J) was incubated without anti-SERPIN antibodies. Scale bars = 20 μm.

Journal: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology : RB&E

Article Title: Differential gene expression of serine protease inhibitors in bovine ovarian follicle: possible involvement in follicular growth and atresia

doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-72

Figure Lengend Snippet: Protein localization of SERPINA5, SERPINB6, SERPINF2 and SERPING1 in E 2 -active and E 2 -inactive follicles . Localization of SERPINA5 (A and B), SERPINB6 (C and D), SERPINF2 (E and F) and SERPING1 (G and H) protein was detected by immunohistochemistry. Sections (7 μm) of bovine E 2 -active (A, C, E and G) and E 2 -inactive follicles (B, D, F and H) were incubated with anti-SERPINA5, anti-SERPINB6, anti-SERPINF2 and anti-SERPING1 polyclonal antibodies. SERPINA5, SERPINB6 and SERPINF2 were detected in the GCs of E 2 -active and E 2 -inactive follicles. SERPING1 was detected in both GCs and the TL of E 2 -active and E 2 -inactive follicles. Negative control (I and J) was incubated without anti-SERPIN antibodies. Scale bars = 20 μm.

Article Snippet: The 7-μm-thick follicular sections were incubated at room temperature for 4 h with rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPINA5 antibody (H00005104, Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan) diluted 1:10, rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPINB6 antibody (GTX114637, GeneTex Inc, Irvine, CA, USA) diluted 1:100, rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPINF2 antibody (H00005345, Abnova) diluted 1:20 or rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPING1 antibody (GTX105316, GeneTex) diluted 1:300 in Discovery Ab diluents (Roche).

Techniques: Immunohistochemistry, Incubation, Negative Control